| User | Post |
|
9:55 am May 27, 2008
| tusken10
Elite User
| | Cincinnati | |
|
| posts 1149 |
|
|
rotobradley said:
Trooper5 said:
Thanks, now I realize just how bad my team does look. 
I think it’s going to be very competitive. All of the teams look good to me.
Oh man, I better hope that LT's injury was a freak last year….I can't afford for him to go down!
|
|
|
11:11 am May 27, 2008
| kethnaab
Elite User
| | | |
|
| posts 1469 |
|
|
I’m rather pleased with my team.
all that has to happen is for Stewie to do what I think he should do, and I think I’ll be in good position to do well.
as for DST, I think I got away with something. Chicago Bears have had > 40 sacks each of the last 2 seasons and have scored more special teams TDs than any other 3 teams combined.
GOOOO DEVIN HESTER!
|
|
|
11:28 am May 27, 2008
| Tavaner
Moderator
| | | |
|
| posts 9994 |
|
|
Nice looking squads…should be a fun league!!!
|
|
|
1:57 pm May 27, 2008
| tusken10
Elite User
| | Cincinnati | |
|
| posts 1149 |
|
|
Ok…I'm draftlexic…where is my banner of shame?
|
|
|
2:04 pm May 27, 2008
| rotobradley
Elite User
| | Kansas City, MO | |
|
| posts 1858 |
|
|
tusken10 said:
Ok…I’m draftlexic…where is my banner of shame?
http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j117/fearlesslogic/xtremedraftlexic1.jpg
Enjoy this. I know I’ll enjoy seeing it.
|
|
|
2:20 pm May 27, 2008
| tusken10
Elite User
| | Cincinnati | |
|
| posts 1149 |
|
|
Gee, thanks Roto. I was hoping that since Hambone still had his up, it would be some kinda one owner at a time kinda thing.
So, how's it look???
|
|
|
2:50 pm May 27, 2008
| Trooper5
Stud
| | | |
|
| posts 316 |
|
|
Tusken, it could be worse, it could be Tom Brady. 
|
|
|
3:18 pm May 27, 2008
| Hambone
Elite User
| | Ontario | |
|
| posts 1721 |
|
|
We're gonna have to form our own little group…Draftlexic Anonymous…
|
|
|
3:21 pm May 27, 2008
| tusken10
Elite User
| | Cincinnati | |
|
| posts 1149 |
|
|
Trooper5 said:
Tusken, it could be worse, it could be Tom Brady. 
Bite your toung, you. Them's figthin' words.
|
|
|
8:39 pm May 27, 2008
| kethnaab
Elite User
| | | |
|
| posts 1469 |
|
|
I swear, I’m going to send each of you draftlexics a copy of my draftboard in excel
makes this type of thing IMPOSSIBLE, that way you aren’t screwed over when you go to pick. makes it stupid easy to track
|
|
|
8:47 pm May 27, 2008
| tusken10
Elite User
| | Cincinnati | |
|
| posts 1149 |
|
|
kethnaab said:
I swear, I’m going to send each of you draftlexics a copy of my draftboard in excel
makes this type of thing IMPOSSIBLE, that way you aren’t screwed over when you go to pick. makes it stupid easy to track
Can you send me a copy of excel? I've been to cheap to buy one and too dull to steal one.
|
|
|
9:23 pm May 27, 2008
| rotobradley
Elite User
| | Kansas City, MO | |
|
| posts 1858 |
|
|
kethnaab said:
I swear, I’m going to send each of you draftlexics a copy of my draftboard in excel
makes this type of thing IMPOSSIBLE, that way you aren’t screwed over when you go to pick. makes it stupid easy to track
I agree thats what I use. Im sure that mine is probably not even close to being as in depth as Keth’s is.
|
|
|
9:28 pm May 27, 2008
| Trooper5
Stud
| | | |
|
| posts 316 |
|
|
I am just keeping track of every pick as they are made on a Microsoft Word.
|
|
|
9:35 pm May 27, 2008
| Hambone
Elite User
| | Ontario | |
|
| posts 1721 |
|
|
kethnaab said:
I swear, I’m going to send each of you draftlexics a copy of my draftboard in excel
makes this type of thing IMPOSSIBLE, that way you aren’t screwed over when you go to pick. makes it stupid easy to track
I'm using Excel spreadsheets…it's just getting a little confusing doing four drafts at the same time.
|
|
|
11:42 pm May 27, 2008
| kethnaab
Elite User
| | | |
|
| posts 1469 |
|
|
is it everyone’s understanding that DST means “Defensive/Special Teams”, and that if you select a DST, then any TD their defense or special teams scores is = 6 points?
i.e. Tav picks Cleveland’s DST, and Shaun Rogers gallops for a TD after picking up a fumble, and JOsh Cribbs returns a punt to the house
that’s 6 points for the fumble recovery for TD, and 6 points for the punt return TD, yes?
|
|
|
11:48 pm May 27, 2008
| Hambone
Elite User
| | Ontario | |
|
| posts 1721 |
|
|
kethnaab said:
is it everyone’s understanding that DST means “Defensive/Special Teams”, and that if you select a DST, then any TD their defense or special teams scores is = 6 points?
i.e. Tav picks Cleveland’s DST, and Shaun Rogers gallops for a TD after picking up a fumble, and JOsh Cribbs returns a punt to the house
that’s 6 points for the fumble recovery for TD, and 6 points for the punt return TD, yes?
Ya, I'm pretty sure that's the case. I think the scoring rules would be on the first couple of pages of this thread.
|
|
|
12:36 am May 28, 2008
| kethnaab
Elite User
| | | |
|
| posts 1469 |
|
|
yeah, Fearless and I were discussing this. It wasn’t explicitly stated, but DST standard rules are that return TDs count as DST TDs, just like an interception return or fumble return
|
|
|
1:21 am May 28, 2008
| FearlessLogic
Elite User
| | State of Nirvana | |
|
| posts 630 |
|
|
Here is the link to the league rules.
http://www.fleaflicker.com/showScoringRules.do?leagueId=27535
Please review it carefully now. You were all excited about the draft order and on holding our initial draft the last time i asked so it’s understandable that no one commented on it.
Let’s disuss any suggestions for revising or adding any scoring criteria and we will vote for a passage of any changes, if needed. Otherwise, if majority is in favor of any scoring rule changes, no need for votes. So i enjoin everyone to take part in the discussion of the proposed changes.
BTW, Fleaflicker has settings for maximum number of players per position, e.g., no one can have more than 5QBs or more than 7 WRs.. Do you want this?
|
|
|
1:49 am May 28, 2008
| kethnaab
Elite User
| | | |
|
| posts 1469 |
|
|
I don’t think it’s going to be necessary, although I’m not totally against it. I don’t think it’s worth really thinking about.
|
|
|
3:18 am May 28, 2008
| FearlessLogic
Elite User
| | State of Nirvana | |
|
| posts 630 |
|
|
kethnaab said:
I don’t think it’s going to be necessary, although I’m not totally against it. I don’t think it’s worth really thinking about.
I did had difficulty updating someone’s roster coz i couldn’t understand why it won’t let me add another WR. Then i saw the message that there’s a rule that no one can have more than 7 WR, yaaay, he is a WR hoarder! Anyway, i have already fixed that. But i thought that maybe we should put a limit at least to the QB position, maybe not more than 5 QBs?
|
|