| User | Post |
|
1:24 pm
May 30, 2008
|
X
Moderator
| | | |
|
| posts 6205 |
|
|
Derek Anderson has won the vote for the #7 dynasty QB according to the members of this forum. Assuming standard scoring, who is your vote for #8?
Top Dynasty QB
1T. Tom Brady
1T. Peyton Manning (thread here)
3. Tony Romo (thread here)
4. Drew Brees (thread here)
5. Ben Roethlisberger (thread here)
6. Carson Palmer (thread here)
7. Derek Anderson (thread here)
|
|
|
1:29 pm
May 30, 2008
|
Gambler
Elite User
| | Pacific NW | |
|
| posts 1195 |
|
|
Going to go with Cutler here
|
|
|
1:36 pm
May 30, 2008
|
Starstruck
Stud
| | Oklahoma | |
|
| posts 255 |
|
|
Garrard, he has a solid running game and he had a very solid year last year with a horrible receiving group. This year the wrs are improved and he is entering year 2 as the fulltime starter with a big fat contract. This guy had very consistent production last year as he outscored most of the names ranked ahead of him more weeks than not. He may not blow up (unless they let him run more), but he will give you a consistent top 10 performance every week.
|
|
|
1:38 pm
May 30, 2008
|
Wutthecrapman
Stud
| | Montreal | |
|
| posts 344 |
|
|
Garrard. The man makes plays with his feet and arm.
Plus I don't have to worry so much about him throwing an INT.
A safe long term investment in a sound system, this is dynasty.
|
|
|
1:44 pm
May 30, 2008
|
rotobradley
Elite User
| | Kansas City, MO | |
|
| posts 1844 |
|
|
|
1:48 pm
May 30, 2008
|
WKTSWAY
Rookie
| | Shakopee, MN | |
|
| posts 128 |
|
|
I will once again put my #6 QB, Cutler.
Sure Garrard doesn't turn the ball over, but you have to go with potential of something great and at minimum being good over consistently good.
|
|
|
1:56 pm
May 30, 2008
|
X
Moderator
| | | |
|
| posts 6205 |
|
|
Starstruck said:
Garrard, he has a solid running game and he had a very solid year last year with a horrible receiving group. This year the wrs are improved and he is entering year 2 as the fulltime starter with a big fat contract. This guy had very consistent production last year as he outscored most of the names ranked ahead of him more weeks than not. He may not blow up (unless they let him run more), but he will give you a consistent top 10 performance every week.
Agree - I'll take Garrard here.
|
|
|
2:14 pm
May 30, 2008
|
Hambone
Elite User
| | Ontario | |
|
| posts 1702 |
|
|
XYZ said:
Starstruck said:
Garrard, he has a solid running game and he had a very solid year last year with a horrible receiving group. This year the wrs are improved and he is entering year 2 as the fulltime starter with a big fat contract. This guy had very consistent production last year as he outscored most of the names ranked ahead of him more weeks than not. He may not blow up (unless they let him run more), but he will give you a consistent top 10 performance every week.
Agree - I'll take Garrard here.
Ya, I'll take the points each and every week…Garrard.
|
|
|
2:33 pm
May 30, 2008
|
haimez40
Hall of Fame
| | | |
|
| posts 2320 |
|
|
Garrard and all his new weapons.
|
|
|
2:33 pm
May 30, 2008
|
itsmedubyo
Stud
| | Loveland, CO | |
|
| posts 348 |
|
|
|
2:33 pm
May 30, 2008
|
X
Moderator
| | | |
|
| posts 6205 |
|
|
WKTSWAY said:
I will once again put my #6 QB, Cutler.
Sure Garrard doesn't turn the ball over, but you have to go with potential of something great and at minimum being good over consistently good.
They both come with questions, but I'm not convinced about Cutler. Seems to be the one young QB continually pimped to be the next in line for greatness, but I don't get that feeling. Not to mention the Broncos offseason has been nothing but bad news - I could see Cutler taking a step back this season. At this spot I am looking for a solid starter that can get me some points every week - I'll take my shot later on a young backup who I think could develop into something.
|
|
|
2:53 pm
May 30, 2008
|
JohnnyD
Rookie
| | | |
|
| posts 53 |
|
|
I think Garrard will be breaking out this year
|
|
|
|
|
who cares…after anderson it becomes the draft two late and spot start guys….if you held me down id say matt and his seahawk attack…
|
|
|
3:00 pm
May 30, 2008
|
haimez40
Hall of Fame
| | | |
|
| posts 2320 |
|
|
FarFromHome said:
who cares…after anderson it becomes the draft two late and spot start guys….if you held me down id say matt and his seahawk attack…
I’m kind of thinking the same thing. I wouldn’t be drafting a QB at this point in a draft and wait till next round most likely. Garrard will have a nice year I think though. They obviously are going to pass more with all the WR they got in offseason.
|
|
|
3:39 pm
May 30, 2008
|
luke_osu
Stud
| | Oklahoma City | |
|
| posts 450 |
|
|
|
5:00 pm
May 30, 2008
|
AllDay028
Rookie
| | | |
|
| posts 191 |
|
|
|
8:49 pm
May 30, 2008
|
X
Moderator
| | | |
|
| posts 6205 |
|
|
Garrard 9
Cutler 3
Hasselbeck 1
|
|
|
11:11 pm
May 30, 2008
|
B D O
Elite User
| | New Orleans | |
|
| posts 1173 |
|
|
Garrard
But I must say that I’m a little surprised so many are voting for him this high. I’m willing to bet he isn’t going this high in most drafts coming up…..or let’s hope not anyway !
|
|
|
11:22 pm
May 30, 2008
|
basher
Elite User
| | | |
|
| posts 794 |
|
|
|
|
|
Its amazing how after DA the QB's get so boring..I have to say Hasslehoff..Oh I am sorry i meant Hasselbeck
|
|
Forums
