Need Expert Advice? Get 1-on-1 Fantasy Football Advice Now!

You must be logged in to post


Lost Your Password?

Search Forums:


 






Wildcard Usage:
*    matches any number of characters
%    matches exactly one character

improving fantasy football experience

UserPost

5:42 am
June 30, 2008


eckdan

Stud

posts 346

i commisioner a small 8 man keeper league with just some friends and family, i am always on the lookout for a new way ot improve the league, my main goal is to make it as fair and equal across the board. there has been two new things that have come up in our "State of the league" meetings that may improve the experience. I am looking for your opinions on both.

#1 – #rd round reversal, it is a 3 player keepr with which you lose the draft pick 2 rounds earlier than the player you wish to keep was drafted, and our draft goes from worst to first. The idea of 3rd rd reversal to my understanding came to play last season and has now seems to be pretty popular, for those who dont know this is where you do serpentine for the first two rounds then when thrid round comes you jump back to the person who picked last and then continue to serpentine in the other direction, this gives the later teams in the first round a chance at better talent.  My concern is that in an 8 team league there really is still very good players avcailabel at the end of round three and the beginning of round 4 that it is actually more advantageous to pick later. but just wondering your opinion

#2 – it always sucks to set your roster for the week, be satisfiesd with who you picked and sit down to watch the game and 5 minutes into the 1st quarter your RB goes down with a knee injury and is out for the game. What i have proposed and would like opinions on, is the ability to use a player who you have designated as your backup/reserve runner, for example, you have Westbrook, jones-drew, jamal lewis chris brown and kolby smith on your roster, yuou decide to start westbrook and jones drew. but put jamal lewis in your reserve back up positon, if westbrook goes down in the 1st quarter, and doesn't return, then all jamal lewis stats from 2nd 3rd and 4th quarter get used, since technically that is exactly what would happen in a real NFL game. Say jamal lewis ran for 60 yds and 2 scores in the first quarter of that game, that wouldnt count, only the stats he accumulated in the quarters after westbrook went out.

I have unfortunatley had players go down very ealry in games and it stinks, espescially in the playoffs, and with adrian peterson last year i was cringing every time he got hit last year. this would just make the games more fair, so that a team didnt win simply because your quarterback got hurt or a receiver pulled a hammy.

Anyway just a thought and would love opinions if either of these make any sense to anyone

I loved The Money Pit . . .That is my answer to that statement

5:56 am
June 30, 2008


ScreamingJesters

Upstate NY

Elite User

posts 601

Well, you asked for it…

#1 – I believe you hit the nail on the head with only 8 owners, there are tons of talent out there into later rounds. I don't believe reversal will seem fair or help out in anyway.

#2 – Where would you cut it off? That doesn't seem fair. Look at it this way.. Say you have LT in and someone like Marion Barber use to be (late scoring clock burner). LT tweeks an ankle and is out after he scores once or twice in the first half, then after that you have Barber come in and scores a couple in the second half? As much as that appeals to you, that is truly unfair to the other owners who have two good backs getting an average game. (110 yds and a score). IMO not cool.

There are SOOOoo many tweeks you can do to scoring and rules that doing something like these seems a not worthy cause.

www.streamlineworld.com/index.cfm Won't be sorry you did.

6:04 am
June 30, 2008


Tavaner

Moderator

posts 14312

I agree with Jesters. It's tough but it's all part of fantasy.

6:08 am
June 30, 2008


eckdan

Stud

posts 346

yes and that is one of the few things that is in the argument against it, however its not like you can just say ok stop using LT, it has to be a legitimate injury, those dont happen all the time, and if you had LT and barber you would likely start both of them, it would only get used if the player got hurt and didnt return to the game, if LT retunrend in the 4th quarter than you woul not be able to use barbers stats, its a hard thing to have make alot of sense, and yes it could actually end up being more of an advantage for the persn to have his guy get hurt, it was just a thought and was discussed, and we ar about 60/40.  with the majority saying, no, i am in the no category and sinc ei am commsiioner that prett ymuch means its 100/0 but i dont rule it like hitler. hte people mast saying to gofor it ar eth epoeple who got screwed at some point last year.

I loved The Money Pit . . .That is my answer to that statement

6:18 am
June 30, 2008


ScreamingJesters

Upstate NY

Elite User

posts 601

As Tav said, it's part of FF. I have been screwed just as much as everyone else and yes it sucks. But doing what your proposing, someone will find a loophole and then owners will argue that it is unfair. Mark my words. As for my example, I was using M.Barber as a name for what he use to be, the back-up late scorer. And how many times has LT been pulled in the second half because he had a "tweek". Where do you rule and will the owner agree? Sorry, just playing devils advocate.

www.streamlineworld.com/index.cfm Won't be sorry you did.

6:57 am
June 30, 2008


eckdan

Stud

posts 346

ScreamingJesters said:

As Tav said, it's part of FF. I have been screwed just as much as everyone else and yes it sucks. But doing what your proposing, someone will find a loophole and then owners will argue that it is unfair. Mark my words. As for my example, I was using M.Barber as a name for what he use to be, the back-up late scorer. And how many times has LT been pulled in the second half because he had a “tweek”. Where do you rule and will the owner agree? Sorry, just playing devils advocate.


definately appreciate it, excellent points, your right, would be very hard to define what would be the cut off and of course someone would get screwed and mess everything up, i agre, ok so the finakl vote is a NO. much aprreciated

I loved The Money Pit . . .That is my answer to that statement



About the Fantasy Football Xtreme forum

Most Users Ever Online: 112

Currently Online: X, Dadadee, totfc, This could be the year
8 Guests

Currently Browsing this Topic:
1 Guest

Forum Stats:

Groups: 3
Forums: 11
Topics: 20695
Posts: 166774

Membership:

There are 4491 Members
There have been 78 Guests

There are 4 Admins
There are 8 Moderators

Top Posters:

JRMRRT – 4235
haimez40 – 3594
MrMarbles – 3522
Scorpion – 3155
North End Dirtdogs – 2774
WeekEnd Warriors – 2708

Recent New Members: This could be the year, jackson, localkine, jimjam97, username, Ferris12

Administrators: Smitty (7824 Posts), ggarnett (4 Posts), Talkbox (10 Posts), Takbax (10 Posts)

Moderators: Smitty (7824 Posts), ggarnett (4 Posts), Tavaner (14312 Posts), X (9661 Posts), Ballgame (224 Posts), Yarco (2 Posts), Zach (2 Posts), editor (1 Post)



Have a fantasy football question ask our staff now! Signup now Xtreme content including rankings, projections, spotlights and more!