Fantasy Football Forums « Fantasy Football Xtreme

Want McCoy… give up Beanie and Scott?

Page: 1

User

Post

1:14 am
November 20, 2009

chuckeycharles

St. Louis

Elite User

posts 1349

Print this Post

Is Beanie and Scott to much to give up for McCoy? Trade calculator says not to make the trade… even if X Omon was included with McCoy (Omon to make if a 2 for 2 deal)

Is Slaton and Scott too little? I kind of think so

Do you see a reasonable deal here… I don't really want to part with Beanie, but, for McCoy, maybe

How about something that swaps the Cowboys for the Bengals?

Trade deadline is Sunday. I need to thin my stable of running backs and solidfy my reserves for the playoff push. I could also use another WR, but, I don't think he gives up Austin or Housh

The owner of Benson could use a couple of extra backs and he is not likely to make the trophy playoffs at 3-7, but he is trying and he could contend in the round robin playoff (bottom 4 teams play in weeks 13-16) for the 1.01 draft choice next year

Next year, assuming I keep ADP then I could only keep one more and…

If I don't do this deal I would probably be choosing between Rice (for my 8th) and Beanie (for my 6th)

With the deal I would choose between Rice and McCoy (for my 10th)

10 Teams – Limited (3 max) keeper league – 15 Player rosters plus 1 player injury slot

Starting Req. = QB – RB – RB/WR – WR – WR/TE – TE – K – DST

Scoring – PPR = 0 / All TD = 6 / Passing = .04 per Yd / Rushing – Receiving = .1 per Yd

QB	RB	WR	TE	K	DST
T Romo	A Peterson (Min)	M Colston	B Celek	O Mare	Cowboys
B Roethlisberger	R Rice	H Ward	V Davis
	B Wells (Ari)	C Johnson (Det)
	C Taylor
	S Slaton
	B Scott
	L Betts (Inj)

M Schaub	L McCoy	M Austin	H Miller	R Longwell	Bengals
K Orton	L Tomlinson	TJ Housh			Ravens
	C Benson	J Maclin
	T Hightower	M Crabtree
		S Smith

3:42 am
November 20, 2009

GRS2

Rookie

posts 192

Print this Post

I'd offer Slaton and Scott for McCoy. It's too early to know if McCoy or Wells will be better long term, plus Beanie's schedule is weak enough in the playoffs that Ari could be actually running the ball. It appears your Non-PPR and the Eagles don't run the ball, so Wells could very well be more help to you. If you have to throw in one of your TE's into the Slaton/Scott deal, I'd rather do that and avoid giving Wells.

4:15 am
November 20, 2009

Tavaner

Moderator

posts 14296

Print this Post

Great advice Bear!

Tav | Fantasy Football Xtreme

Need Expert Advice? Get 1-on-1 Fantasy Football Advice now!

8:34 am
November 20, 2009

chuckeycharles

St. Louis

Elite User

posts 1349

Print this Post

So… maybe Scott, Slaton and V Davis for McCoy and Miller?

I'm trying to look at it from the other guy's point of view…

It really looks like Westy is done and McCoy is clearly his replacement. Scott is only a handcuff… this week a very good one… but, LJ is lurking (picked him up in one league instead of Scott)

Slaton is ??????????????????????????? for the rest of the season and would not be a very good keeper for this guy the way the rules work

V Davis has better numbers than Celek, but, a worse offense

I guess I will offer him Slaton, Scott and Davis for McCoy and Miller and then go get McGahee as a handcuff for Rice… should I throw in Betts?

12:51 pm
November 20, 2009

GRS2

Rookie

posts 192

Print this Post

I think Slaton, Scott, V.Davis for McCoy gets it done.
With the addition of McCoy, none of the guys you're giving are one of your 8 keepers and neither are your TE's. Your past the bye's, so I'd put my eggs in a basket and try to win it all while still making my keepers stronger. However, in Non-ppr you'd probably be keeping Rice for the 10th instead of McCoy, so if there is no option to keep one of them for the 9th… there might be no sense in giving up your depth in this trade.

Page: 1

	You must be logged in to post

Need Expert Advice? Get 1-on-1 Fantasy Football Advice Now!