Need Expert Advice? Get 1-on-1 Fantasy Football Advice Now!

You must be logged in to post

 
Search Forums:


 




Would you take this deal?

UserPost

10:21 pm
November 16, 2008


Pisani44

Rookie

posts 49

1

I have been offered a trade in my league.  I am already a lock for the playoffs.  So I am looking at this as a trade to help carry me through the playoffs.  Here's the trade:  (I will show their playoff schedule)                                 

I Get:  Willie Parker ( @NE, vs Dal, @Balt) and Plaxico Burress ( @Wash, vs Phi, @ Dal)

I Give: CJ2 ( vs Ten, vs Min, @Ind)  and McFadden ( vs KC, @SD, vs NE)

My RBs: SJax, Slaton, Stewart, McFadden, RWilliams

My WRs: CJ2, Bowe, Colston, Holt, Breaston

Non-ppr standard scoring league

My concern is Parker's schedule, plus CJ2 has been so consistant for me since RWilliams was traded. 

9:59 am
November 17, 2008


X

Moderator

posts 6644

2

I'd pass.  While it would be nice to unload McFadden, getting Parker and Burress is not exactly an upgrade - CJ2 has played pretty well throughout the Lions mess.

11:06 am
November 17, 2008


MrMarbles

Hall of Fame

Ontario, Canada

posts 2772

3

I’d take that deal in redraft. In dynasty I’d have to think about it longer…but as long as Parker stays healthy he will produce big time. I’m not a huge fan of Plax, but the upgrade at RB is greater than the downgrade you take at WR.

Also might depend on what the rest of your roster looks like

1:58 pm
November 17, 2008


Tavaner

Moderator

posts 10003

4

I would pass as well. It’s a sideways move, imo. CJ2 is your #1.

Bowe is a #2 basically getting the same amount of looks as Gonzo and the Bradley in KC now.
Colston is good for week 14-16 but has GB and TB coming up - a must start with subdued production, imo.
Holt is lost in StL. Start-able only in dire circumstances as he’s has single digit fantasy production in all but two games this year.
Breaston is a WR3 and therefore inconsistent (in non ppr)

Burress continues to get 3 catches pg to keep defenses honest and then they look elsewhere. That doghouse is deep.
Parker looks to be back but Bal and Tenn in weeks 15/16 isn’t going to help you, imo.

2:13 pm
November 17, 2008


MrMarbles

Hall of Fame

Ontario, Canada

posts 2772

5

MrMarbles said:


Also might depend on what the rest of your roster looks like


Would also help if I read a little more closely!!! LOL
I see the rosters and I’d still do the deal…but that’s me. With SJax on the mend it gives you another option at RB. I would not fault you for keeping CJ2…I like his ability a lot

9:56 pm
November 17, 2008


over_rated_10

Stud

oklahoma

posts 228

6

I dont do the trade just m/o

4:28 pm
November 18, 2008


gummybearsrule

Rookie

posts 9

7

i dont like burress. cj2 is a better option unless you needed parker

 

About the forum

Currently Online:

overachiever77

zep16

11 Guests

Maximum Online: 112

Forums:

Groups: 3

Forums: 10

Topics: 10513

Posts: 87781

Members:

There are 2879 members

There are 78 guests


Smitty has made 6225 posts

Top Posters:

Tavaner - 10003

X - 6644

MrMarbles - 2772

WeekEnd Warriors - 2503

haimez40 - 2383

Administrator: Smitty | Moderators: Smitty, editor, ggarnett, Tavaner, Ballgame, X, Takbax, Yarco, Zach


© Simple:Press Forum - Version 3.1.4 (Build 357)  

Have a fantasy football question ask our staff now! Signup now Xtreme content including rankings, projections, spotlights and more!